Sunday, April 26, 2015

compass

A moral compass can serve to provide us direction for our life.

When we are born we have no direction; we are incapable of setting our direction. Picture this as being in the center of a compass without an arrow.


As we grow we begin to realize gradually that we possess some level of autonomy. We cry and we get held or fed or our diapers changed.

School brings our autonomy to a new level. We can choose to learn, or not. We can respect our teachers, or not. In school and out, we can choose to be “naughty or nice”. We have an arrow on our compass to show us the direction that we are going.


By middle school many of us start thinking about the future. What will I do when school is done? Will I need college to do what I want to do? We make plans and set our direction accordingly.

If we haven’t set our direction for life in general during our school years, many of us will set it when we’re done. We fix the direction arrow on our compass.

In addition to our BIG compass (the direction that we want to go with our life in general) there are “little” compasses too—integrity, honesty, how we treat others, how we treat the gifts of our environment—air, water, etc.

During the course of our lives many of us compare where we’ve been, where we are and where we’re going with the direction that we set on our compass. If we think of the person that we want to be as “due north”, then where are we? Which way have we been going? Which way are we headed now? Are we north of center? Have we been going north? Are we going north now? Or, are we south of center? Have we been going south? Are we so far south that we’ll never get where we wanted to go (north)?


A moral compass can be useful in telling us where we are, where we’ve been and where we want to go with our lives.




Monday, April 20, 2015

holy ? church

About five years or so ago, wording in the Catholic mass changed. One of those changes was a response:

"May the Lord accept the sacrifice at your hands for the praise and glory of his name for our good and the good of all his Church." (before)

"May the Lord accept the sacrifice at your hands for the praise and glory of his name for our good and the good of all his holy Church." (after)

One word was inserted: "holy".

Since those changes were made, I've wondered why. Why would the church add one word to a response that seems totally adequate as it stands? More importantly, why would the church add this one word to this response at a time when child sexual abuse by priests and higher-ups covering it up has become public?

In Mark 10:18 and Luke 18:19 Jesus says that only God is holy.

 "holy" church? I don't think so.



Friday, April 17, 2015

Give Mr. Hughes a medal

Gyrocopter Pilot Charged for Landing on US Capitol Grounds - ABC News

If exposing the Federal government's ineptitude (gaping hole in security) is a crime, then we all ought to be in jail.

They should give Mr. Hughes a medal!







Tuesday, April 7, 2015

MUCH too high a price to pay

Utility Removed Removed Stolen Electric Meter Before 8 Were Pois - WBOC-TV 16, Delmarvas News Leader, FOX 21 -

Bottom line: 8 people (7 children) are dead because of a stolen electric meter. Needless to say, nobody should die because of a stolen electric meter.



the sad state of the news media

Do we really need the weather reported three times in a 30-minute news broadcast? especially when there's nothing "newsworthy" about the weather (tornado, blizzard, monsoon, etc.)?

Do we really need news reports taken from press releases by a reporter sitting at a desk behind a computer?

Do we really need reports as to what's being said on Twitter, etc. about the "news"?

Do we really need "talking heads" to tell us how we should understand the "news"?

Do we really need to have "10 ways that garlic is good for you" in the "news"?

Do we really need the same "news" regurgitated day after day, week after week (nothing "new")?

I don't think so.

I long for the day when reporters actually reported news. They didn't just disseminate press releases carte blanche. They actually went to the place where the news was happening. They observed. They investigated. They interviewed. They asked questions. They verified. 

Not so today. The news could be right outside their windows; reporters "report" the news from their computer. You'd think that their eyes would be strained and their butts would be sore from all that sitting behind a computer!